Hindu community targeted with derogatory social media remark by leftist-Dravidianist influencer
Tamil Nadu, India 
8 February, 2026
Case Summary
A derogatory anti-Hindu remark targeting the entire Hindu community was made on social media by a leftist-Dravidianist social media influencer named Ravi. The accused on social media platform X, formerly Twitter, called the entire Hindu community casteist and tried to create inter-Hindu fights on caste lines. On 9 February 2026, the accused made an X post stating: "A proud Hindu is just a proud casteist." The accused had twenty-one thousand nine hundred followers, and his post targeting the Hindu community went viral, crossing more than fifty-one thousand views and more than one thousand likes. The accused's tweet led to outrage by Hindu users of X who condemned and called out his remark. A Hindu handle named Arya Anviksha replied to the accused's comment by saying: "The bitter truth is caste was never the target. Hindu identity was. When every group is reduced, isolated, and delegitimised, the final step is obvious to erase the religion itself by criminalising pride in it. You thought sacrificing your own would buy you peace. You thought disowning your identity would satisfy them and earn mercy, remove the tag of 'casteist'. You were wrong. When every Hindu community is branded backward, oppressive, guilty the final verdict is inevitable, Hinduism itself is the crime. The endgame is simple erase the civilisation by criminalising belief of Hindus one by one." Notably, Dravidian activists have a documented history of issuing anti-Hindu statements, with the Hinduphobia Tracker recording several prior cases involving Dravidian writers and political figures who issued even more inflammatory remarks on Hinduism. One example involved Dravidian propagandist author Nilakanthan RS, who vilified Hindus as demons, branded the revered Gurukula tradition as casteist and anti-modern, and dismissed the Mahabharata, a cornerstone Hindu epic, as a "shitty epic". In a similar incident on 2 September 2023, Udhayanidhi Stalin, then Tamil Nadu's Deputy Chief Minister, delivered hate speech demanding the "eradication" of Sanatana Dharma (Hinduism), equating it to mosquitoes and diseases. He represented the Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK) party, a Dravidian party.
Why it is Hate Crime ?
This case is being added to the tracker under the primary category- Hate speech against Hindus. The subcategory selected is- Anti-Hindu slurs, mocking faith. Anti-Hindu slurs and the deliberate mocking of the Hindu faith owing to religious animosity involve the usage of derogatory terms, stereotypes, or offensive references to religious practices, symbols, or figures. One of the common anti-Hindu slurs used against Hindus is “cow-worshipper” and “cow piss drinker”. The intention of using this term is to demean and mock Hindus as a group and their religious beliefs since Hindus consider the cow holy. Additionally, some symbols and the slurs attached to them have a historical context that exacerbates the insult, hate, stereotyping, dehumanisation and oppression against Hindus. Cow worship has been used for centuries to denigrate Hindus, insult their faith and oppress Hindus specifically as a religious group. There has been overwhelming documentation about how cow slaughter has been used to persecute Hindus with cow meat being thrown in temples and places of worship. There has also been overwhelming documentation where cow meat (beef) has been force-fed to Hindus to either forcefully convert them to Islam or denigrate their faith. Apart from cow worship, the Swastika – which holds deep religious significance for the Hindus – has also been misinterpreted and distorted to use as a slur against Hindus. Similarly, the worship of the Shivling has been used by supremacist ideologies and religions to denigrate Hindus owing to religious animosity. Such slurs and denigration stem out of inherent animosity and hate towards Hindus and their faith, therefore, it is categorised as hate speech targeted at Hindus specifically owing to their religious identity. This case constitutes a blatant instance of religiously motivated hate speech as the perpetrator boldly proclaimed that "a proud Hindu is just a proud casteist," unleashing a derogatory assault on every member of the Hindu community. This vicious equation of Hindu pride with casteism lays bare his deep-seated animosity towards Hinduism itself, reducing the legitimate devotion of millions to a caricature of prejudice. Every day, Hindu families cherishing festivals, devotees offering prayers at dawn, youth embracing their cultural roots, suddenly find their identity vilified as inherently bigoted, a calculated smear that exposes Ravi's profound hatred for both the Hindu faith and its followers. Such rhetoric does not critique isolated flaws; it demonises an entire people for daring to take pride in their heritage, marking it unequivocally as hate speech fuelled by religious prejudice. Hinduism stands as a vast and vibrant tapestry of traditions, from the ascetic rigours of Shaivism and the devotional ecstasy of Vaishnavism to the esoteric depths of Tantric sects and the egalitarian embrace of Bhakti movements like those led by saints such as Kabir, Ravidas, and Mirabai. In these paths, caste, gender, or any social label fades into irrelevance; what counts is unwavering devotion, moral living, and adherence to timeless sacred practices that uplift the soul. Hinduism has birthed its own fearless reformers, from Bhakti poets challenging hierarchies to modern thinkers questioning religious customs, proving its capacity for self-evolution without external vilification. Yet Ravi ignores this rich diversity, opting instead to tar all Hindus with the same brush, a deliberate ploy to fracture the community along caste lines and perpetuate a false narrative of upper versus lower castes. By insisting that every proud Hindu is inherently a casteist, the perpetrator sows division within Hindu society, goading different caste groups to turn on each other over manufactured grievances while shielding his true aim: to dismantle Hindu unity and pride. This insidious tactic portrays Hinduism as primitive, oppressive, and irredeemable by nature, a faith unworthy of celebration, precisely the playbook of those harbouring premeditated contempt. Ordinary Hindus, already navigating a world quick to caricature their traditions, face this as yet another blow to their collective spirit, their reformers' legacies erased in favour of divisive lies. Such calculated provocation reveals not mere opinion, but weaponised hatred designed to humiliate and isolate the Hindu community. This rhetoric cements the case as religiously motivated hate speech, linking Hindu identity itself with supposed moral inferiority and igniting inter-community strife. The perpetrator's words drip with contempt for Hinduism's essence, targeting its followers for the simple act of self-affirmation. Therefore, it qualifies unequivocally as hate speech, warranting documentation in the tracker's Hate Crime database to expose and confront such targeted bigotry.
Case Status
Unknown
Perpetrators Details
Perpetrators
Others
Perpetrators Range
One Person
Perpetrators Gender
male
Sources 
