Hindu woman driven to attempted suicide after being raped under marriage pretext and force-fed beef by Muslim man in Uttar Pradesh

Case ID : d327650 | Location : Raebareli, Uttar Pradesh, India | Date of Incident : Tue, 6 February, 2024
Case ID : d327650
location Raebareli, Uttar Pradesh, India
date 6 February, 2024
Hindu woman driven to attempted suicide after being raped under marriage pretext and force-fed beef by Muslim man in Uttar Pradesh
Crimes against women in relationships and other sexual crimes
Brainwashed and/or groomed
Victim says she was brainwashed/groomed
Rape and sexual assault/harassment
Forced conversion before marriage
Forced to eat beef
Suicide for being forced to or pressured to convert

Case Summary

In Raebareli, Uttar Pradesh, a Hindu woman belonging to the Dalit community was raped several times under the pretext of marriage by a Muslim man named Mukeem. She was initially lured into a relationship for nearly two years, after which the perpetrator and his family compelled her to eat beef (cow meat). Subsequently traumatised by these events, the victim was contemplating and trying to attempt suicide. According to reports, the victim’s mother, a Hindu woman, made a complaint to the police against Mukeem. She stated in the complaint that the accused, who was a quack doctor and a resident of Rasulpur village, had promised to marry her daughter. The accused took the young woman to a hotel in the town several times after luring her, where he raped her forcibly. During this time, when the young Hindu woman became pregnant, the accused got her abortion done. When the Hindu victim became suspicious of the man, she went to his house and insisted on being married. Mukeem's family then demanded that she eat beef as a condition for the marriage. Following this, she was force-fed beef by them. After this, his family sent her home with the assurance that she would marry him in a few days. However, some time later, the woman learned that Mukeem was already married and had a child. This information left her mentally shattered, and she decided to end her life by committing suicide. Her mother learned of the incident in time and immediately informed other family members. The girl's father, who lived in Delhi, immediately returned home and filed a complaint at the local police station, pleading for justice. The police immediately registered a case and began an investigation. Rae Bareli Additional Superintendent of Police Sanjeev Kumar Sinha stated that the accused, Mukeem, had been arrested and sent to jail. The police were investigating the case at the time of writing this report.

Why it is Hate Crime ?

This case has been added to the tracker under the primary category of - Crimes against women in relationships and other sexual crimes. Within it, the sub-category selected is - Brainwashed and/or groomed, with the tertiary category being - Rape and sexual assault/harassment, and the victim says she was brainwashed/groomed. In our database, we have not added incidents where women have converted to another religion of their free will, and no allegations of forced/involuntary conversion have been made. However, there are certain cases of conversion where the consent itself is a result of the brainwashing or grooming of a minor by the non-Hindu perpetrator trying to victimise a woman for her Hindu religious identity. The phenomenon of grooming points to non-Hindu perpetrators identifying their Hindu victims’ vulnerabilities and exploiting them over months and sometimes years, to extract the supposed ‘consent’ to convert their religion. In most cases of grooming, the victims are minors, or the grooming started when the victim was a minor. In other cases of grooming, the non-Hindu perpetrator brainwashes and grooms a minor victim to extract their trust and then proceeds to rape them repeatedly with the intent of converting them to their faith. It is pertinent to understand here that when the victim is a minor, the ‘consent’ to convert or enter into a romantic relationship with an adult itself is redundant – addressed by POCSO. While every case of conversion of a minor and incidents of establishing a physical relationship with a minor by an adult are crimes, for this database, a case would be considered a hate crime only if there is a distinct religious angle to the grooming. For example, in the UK, if a Hindu minor is targeted by Pakistani grooming gangs, it would be considered a hate crime because the victims are specifically targeted owing to their non-Muslim religious identity, with the perpetrators being Muslim. In other cases, if a Hindu minor is brainwashed into entering a physical relationship with the non-Hindu adult perpetrator and the family alleges grooming/brainwashing of the minor to convert her religion, it would form a part of this database. If the victim is a Hindu adult, the case would form a part of this database only if the victim herself says that she was brainwashed/groomed to convert her religion. However, if the victim is deceased (murdered or otherwise), the case would form a part of this database if her family/friends provided testimony that the victim was brainwashed/groomed to convert her religion. Since these crimes have a distinct religious angle where the victim is being targeted owing to her Hindu religious identity, these cases are considered hate crimes. The other sub-category selected here is - Forced conversion before marriage, with the tertiary category being - Forced to eat beef. In such cases, a non-Hindu man is in a relationship with a Hindu woman when the pressure to convert her religion begins to manifest. In such cases, typically, two patterns emerge. First, when the relationship is consensual, and the religious identity of the perpetrator is known to the Hindu woman in the relationship, however, at some point during the relationship, the non-Hindu man starts to force the victim to convert her religion and give up her Hindu religious identity. The second is when the woman gets into a marriage with the man, pretending to share her faith. Later, when the truth is revealed, the man starts pressuring the woman to convert her religion and give up her religious identity. In both situations, the methods used to force the victim to convert her religion often revolve around force-feeding beef, forcing her to wear hijab, forcing her to read the Kalma or even pressurising the victim to do ‘Nikah’, which is marriage under Islamic law, with a prerequisite being conversion to Islam. Cases where a Hindu woman consensually converts to Islam in a relationship will be left out of the hate crime database, even though it could be argued in several cases that the conversion was a result of religious brainwashing. The other subcategory selected is- Suicide for being forced to or pressured to convert. When Hindu women are in a relationship with a non-Hindu men, there are cases where the woman faces pressure/threats/violence to convert and change her religious identity by the non-Hindu man. Such relationships may be consensual with the religious identity of the non-Hindu man known to the victim. Somewhere along the relationship, the non-Hindu man starts pressurizing the Hindu woman to convert. In some of these cases, unable to bear the pressure/threat/violence being mounted by the non-Hindu partner to convert, the Hindu woman commits suicide. In such cases, often, threats are also given to the family members of the Hindu woman. Since such cases are driven by specific religious motivations and against the religious identity of the victim, leading to the woman committing suicide, these cases are categorized as a hate crime. This case from Raebareli, Uttar Pradesh, exhibited multiple religious markers that clearly established it as a religiously motivated crime specifically targeting a Hindu victim for her faith identity. The Hindu woman was raped several times under the pretext of marriage and force-fed beef as a condition for marriage. This showcased the religiously motivated nature of the overall crime. Firstly, Mukeem engaged in a prolonged relationship with the Hindu victim under the pretext of marriage, during which he raped her several times. In this context, where the victim was later forced to eat beef, it is important to note that the rape was not committed for sexual pleasure. Rather, it was carried out to sexually violate the identity of the Hindu victim. It was committed with the intent to humiliate her because of her faith identity, making it a religiously motivated rape. Moreover, the accused raped the victim for nearly two years, during which he made her undergo an abortion twice and continued raping her thereafter. This pattern of repeated sexual violence on a Hindu woman due to her faith identity reflected the sheer severity and brutality of the crime and underscored the sustained and deliberate nature with which it was committed. Secondly, the Muslim man systematically coerced her to convert to Islam by force-feeding her beef. He not only exploited her emotionally and physically but also pressured her to perform actions deeply offensive to her religious beliefs, such as eating beef. These acts were not incidental but were deliberately aimed at forcing a change in her faith. The cow is a sacred animal in Hinduism, and eating beef constitutes a great sacrilege for any Hindu, as they view the cow as a holy animal that should never be killed under any circumstances. Therefore, the act of forcing a Hindu woman to eat beef constituted a deep violation, not merely of personal choice but of religious sanctity. This act was not simply a dietary imposition; it was a targeted attack on the core of the victim's belief system, intended to degrade and desecrate what she held holy. Such coercion amounted to psychological and spiritual violence, designed to humiliate her and strip her of religious dignity and identity. This also opened the door for religious conversion, as seen historically when Muslim extremists slaughtered cows and force-fed Hindus beef to desecrate their faith and convert them to Islam. This case demonstrates the same religiously motivated predatory acts aimed at destroying the victim's Hindu identity, making it a religiously motivated crime. Further, the violent and manipulative tactics used by Mukeem, such as rape, blackmail, and emotional manipulation, aimed at forcing her to abandon her Hindu beliefs, were indicative of a targeted assault on her religious identity. This was a hallmark of religiously motivated hate crimes, where the victim's religious identity became the focal point of the attack. The demand that the woman eat beef, a direct assault on Hindu dietary practices, represented a form of religious aggression intended to compel her to renounce her beliefs. In many instances of forced religious conversion, perpetrators imposed practices antithetical to the victim's faith, and in this case, Mukeem's insistence on her consuming beef reflected a clear effort to degrade and subjugate her religious identity. Such coercion, particularly when linked with sexual assault, reflected the religious manipulation inherent in this case. Furthermore, when the victim discovered that Mukeem was already married, she decided to commit suicide. This attempt/contemplation showcased the extent of coercion, betrayal, and manipulation to which she had been subjected by the perpetrator, all due to her Hindu identity. Overall, this amounted to a hate crime rooted in anti-Hindu animosity; therefore, the case has been added to the hate crime database of the Hinduphobia Tracker. Disclaimer: The Hinduphobia Tracker records the date of an incident based on when the victim's ordeal began, rather than when the media reported it. In this case, available details suggest that the victim and the accused first came into contact in 2024, though the exact date and month are not provided. The media reported the case on 7 February 2026. Based on this information, an indicative date of 7 February 2024 has been selected as the indicative incident date. This is recorded for documentation purposes only. Another important aspect to highlight is that reports in this case specified that the Hindu woman was also targeted by the Muslim family of Mukeem. However, reports did not detail the total number of perpetrators within the family. They only named Mukeem explicitly. Henceforth, only one perpetrator is considered the indicative perpetrator for this case. The perpetrator count is recorded as one (1) for documentation purposes. This is a conservative estimate, as the actual number could be higher.

Victim Details

Total Victim

1

Deceased

0


Gender

  • Male 0
  • Female 1
  • Third Gender 0
  • Unknown 0

Caste

  • SC/ST 1
  • OBC 0
  • General 0
  • Unknown 0

Age Group

  • Minor 0
  • Adult 1
  • Senior Citizen 0
  • Unknown 0
Case Status Background
Gavel Icon

Case Status


Arrested

Case Status Background
Gavel Icon

Perpetrators Details

Perpetrators


Muslim Extremists

Perpetrators Range


One Person

Perpetrators Gender


male

Case Details SVG
The details of each case are updated till the day it has been added to the database. It is not practical for us to manually track the progress of every case listed in the Hinduphobia Tracker database. If you have additional information which you believe should reflect here, please provide additional details by clicking the button below. If you believe this case should not be considered a religiously motivated hate crime, you can proceed to raise a dispute using the same button.
Please note the case ID: d327650 <click to copy case id>, you must enter the same in the form which will pop up after clicking the button.