Hindu women and children targeted for conversion by Christian missionaries; Hinduism denigrated and money offered

Case ID : 995850c | Location : Azamgarh, Uttar Pradesh, India | Date of Incident : Sun, 31 August, 2025
Case ID : 995850c
location Azamgarh, Uttar Pradesh, India
date 31 August, 2025
Hindu women and children targeted for conversion by Christian missionaries; Hinduism denigrated and money offered
Predatory Proselytisation
Attempting to convert/converting by denigrating Hinduism
Conversion/ attempts to convert by inducement
Proselytisation by grooming, brainwashing, manipulation or subtle indoctrination
Pattern of targeting Hindus
Conversion of minor

Case Summary

In Fulesh village of Azamgarh, Uttar Pradesh, Hindu women and children were brainwashed and targeted for conversion by Christian missionaries. Missionaries denigrated Hinduism and offered inducements in order to convert Hindu villagers. According to a complaint filed by Roshan Lal Rajbhar, a Christian woman named Geeta and her brother-in-law, Chandresh, organised a satsang at her house. When Roshan attended, he observed that Hindu gods and goddesses were being abused and insulted. He stated that the missionaries were spreading superstition among Hindu women and children under the pretext of curing ghosts and spirits. When he opposed these illegal conversion activities, he was offered money and was asked to convert to Christianity. Following this, the police were informed, and a complaint was filed by Roshan. Based on the complaint, the police registered a case against Geeta Devi and Chandresh for religious conversion and took both into custody for interrogation. As of the date of writing, the matter remained under investigation.

Why it is Hate Crime ?

This case has been added to the tracker under the primary category- Predatory Proselytisation. Within this, the subcategory selected is - Attempting to convert/converting by denigrating Hinduism. In several cases, Hindus are converted or an attempt is made to convert Hindus by denigrating their faith, Hinduism. In such cases, the Hindus associate with the non-Hindu perpetrators often by choice and then, the attempt to convert them by insulting their faith, showing the faith down etc begins. An example of this would be a non-Hindu gathering where the Hindus are attending the gathering of their own free will. However, once they attend the gathering, there is an explicit attempt to convert them by abusing their faith and hailing the faith of the perpetrator. The denigration of the Hindu faith is often based on misrepresentation of the Hindu faith, its doctrine and scriptures and insult to espoused traditions if not blatant lies about Hindu beliefs and ways. Such conversions or attempts at conversions are driven by animosity towards the Hindu faith and are therefore documented as religiously motivated hate crimes. The second sub-category selected is- Conversion/ attempts to convert by inducement. Predatory Proselytisation is not just limited to threat, harassment, force and violence, but it also has contours of stealth. In several cases, the Hindu victim is exploited to convert, with non-Hindus taking advantage of their poverty. In such cases, the Hindu victim who is suffering financially is offered monetary benefits, including lucrative offers for jobs, health treatment, education, etc, to induce the victim into changing his/her religion. In such cases, the religious identity of the victim and the aim to disenfranchise him from his faith form the heart of the crime. Also, taking advantage of and exploiting an individual’s economic vulnerabilities is widely acknowledged as exploitation, forms of which are often penalised by law. Such cases therefore are considered religiously motivated hate crimes since the victim’s religious identity forms the very heart of the crime itself. The third sub-category selected here is - Proselytisation by grooming, brainwashing, manipulation or subtle indoctrination, with the tertiary category being - Pattern of targeting Hindus and Conversion of minor. Religious brainwashing essentially means the often subtle and forcible indoctrination to induce someone to give up their religious beliefs to accept contrasting regimented ideas. Religious grooming or brainwashing also involves propaganda and manipulation. It involves the systematic effort, driven by religious malice and indoctrination, to persuade “non-believers’ to accept allegiance, command, or doctrine to and of a contrasting faith. Cases of such grooming or brainwashing are far more nuanced than direct threats, coercion, inducement and violence. In such cases, it is often seen that there is repeated, subtle and continual manipulation of the victim to induce disaffection towards their own faith and acceptance of the contrasting faith of the perpetrator. While subtle indoctrination is widely acknowledged as predatory, an element which is often understated in such conversions or the attempts of such conversion is the role of loyalty and trust which might develop between the perpetrator and the victim. Fiduciary relationships are often abused to affect such religious conversion. For example, an educator transmitting religious doctrine of a competing faith to a Hindu student. The Hindu student is likely to accept what the teacher is transmitting owing to existence of the fiduciary relationship. The exploitation of the fiduciary relationship to religiously indoctrinate victims would also be included in this category. Since the underlying animosity towards the victim’s faith forms the basis of predatory proselytization, such cases are considered religiously motivated hate crimes. This case has been added to the tracker because Hindu women and children were brainwashed and targeted for conversion by Christian missionaries. Missionaries abused and denigrated Hinduism in order to push Hindu villagers towards conversion. This goes beyond religious debate or proselytisation; it constitutes an act of incitement and insult directed at the core beliefs of the Hindu community. Such remarks are designed to demean and undermine the faith of Hindus and intend to create an inferiority complex in the minds of the victims against their own faith. This fosters an environment of hostility and disrespect towards the Hindu community and Hindu deities. These acts of insulting Hinduism stem from Christian theology, which harbours disdain and hatred for polytheistic faiths, and which categorises Hindus as ‘polytheists’, thereby fostering hatred against them. Such actions make the religiously motivated nature of the crime even more evident. Furthermore, when Roshan opposed the illegal conversion, he was offered money and was asked to convert to Christianity. Offering incentives or money, especially when directed at vulnerable individuals in need, shows that these incentives are not acts of kindness or charity. Instead, they are calculated moves to exploit vulnerable Hindus because of their religion. By providing inducements in exchange for conversion, the accused were effectively blackmailing those who might have been desperate for assistance or hope. This also suggests that other victims were pushed towards conversion in a similar way. Such instances are seen in many cases where members of Christian missionary groups target socially and economically vulnerable Hindus to further their agenda of religious conversions. This form of coercion strips people of their agency and dignity and results in coerced conversions. These are not random or isolated incidents, but rather cases deeply rooted in religious animosity towards Hindu victims. It is important to note here that the grooming was being carried out under the guise of satsang. Satsang is a Hindu event meant for spiritual gathering, devotion, and learning. Using it to carry out proselytisation activity is a deliberate act of deception that not only violates the sanctity of a Hindu religious practice but also exploits the trust of participants who attend such gatherings with faith and sincerity. This method of manipulation is especially dangerous because it disguises coercive or persuasive conversion attempts as spiritual discourse, making the victims more vulnerable to indoctrination. It represents a calculated abuse of Hindu traditions to undermine the very community that upholds them. It is further important to note here that children were also present where these conversion activities took place. Since some of the victims were minors, this means the element of consent and genuine change of conscience was missing ab initio. Minors, due to their young age and lack of maturity, are particularly vulnerable to manipulation and coercion. They may not have the ability to fully understand the implications of converting to another religion, and the Christian perpetrator purposely targeted and exploited this vulnerability of the victim. Such acts are not merely criminal in nature; they are ideologically charged, revealing religious prejudice and a calculated intent to alter the religious identity of minors without their volition. The Christian faith, by its very theological foundations, places a strong emphasis on proselytisation. In pursuit of conversion objectives, Christian evangelists often employ unethical means, ranging from denigration of Hinduism to inducements such as money or jobs. In such cases, Christian missionary groups often target and brainwash socially and economically vulnerable Hindus to further their agenda of religious conversions. This form of coercion strips Hindus of their agency and dignity and enforces forced conversions. These are not random or isolated incidents, but rather premeditated efforts to undermine the Hindu faith, persuade Hindus to discard their own faith, and convert to Christianity. Such acts were deeply rooted in religious animosity towards Hindu victims, and thus, this case was added to the tracker. Disclaimer: The Hinduphobia Tracker records incidents based on when the victim’s ordeal began. However, in this case, the report does not provide specific details regarding when the event took place or since when these conversion activities had been going on. Therefore, for documentation purposes, the date of the incident has been recorded as the date it was reported in the media – September 1, 2025.

Case Status Background
Gavel Icon

Case Status


Complaint registered

Case Status Background
Gavel Icon

Perpetrators Details

Perpetrators


Christian Extremists

Perpetrators Range


From 2 To 5

Perpetrators Gender


both

Case Details SVG
The details of each case are updated till the day it has been added to the database. It is not practical for us to manually track the progress of every case listed in the Hinduphobia Tracker database. If you have additional information which you believe should reflect here, please provide additional details by clicking the button below. If you believe this case should not be considered a religiously motivated hate crime, you can proceed to raise a dispute using the same button.
Please note the case ID: 995850c <click to copy case id>, you must enter the same in the form which will pop up after clicking the button.