Minor Hindu children made to drink urine by Muslim classmates on instructions of Maulvi
Case Summary
In the Dhikoli village of Baghpat, Uttar Pradesh, minor Hindu students were deceptively made to drink urine by two of their Muslim classmates, on the instructions of a Maulvi Ayan Babbar. According to reports, at Primary School No. 2, Dhikoli village, two Muslim boys were repeatedly urinating into the water bottles of Hindu classmates over several days. The victim included three minor Hindu children, including two siblings aged six and seven and their neighbour’s daughter, who unknowingly drank from the contaminated bottle. When the parents asked the children about a foul smell emanating from their bottles for the past three days, they replied that they had no information about it. The victim's parents then told the children to keep the bottle with them and not share it with anyone. On 13 November 2025, one of the children found his water bottle missing and went looking for it. He discovered that his Muslim classmate was urinating into the bottle near the school bathroom. He immediately took the bottle and complained to the school Principal, Yudhveer Singh, after which the school administration questioned the Muslim students and called their families. During questioning, the perpetrators admitted that they had been urinating into the bottles for the past four days and claimed that they were doing it on the instructions of Maulvi Ayan Babbar, the village cleric. This triggered anger among parents and villagers, who gathered at the school the next morning, demanding strict action against the perpetrators. Villagers also reported that a girl had developed a facial infection and another boy had suffered mild paralysis following consumption from the bottles. Police officers, including Circle Officer Rohan Chaurasia and Station House Officer Atar Singh, reached the school, pacified the agitated families, and began an investigation. In the complaint filed by the victims’ families, it was stated that the Muslim cleric, Ayan Babbar, had deliberately influenced the Muslim children to carry out the act as part of an effort to corrupt the faith of Hindu students. As of the date of writing this report, the police began a search operation to trace the cleric, while assuring villagers that strict action would follow upon the completion of the inquiry. It is important to note here that Principal Yudhveer Singh also revealed that Maulvi Ayan Babbar had earlier been accused by villagers of stopping children inside a mosque on Independence Day and instigating them to raise religious and communal slogans.
Why it is Hate Crime ?
This case has been added to the tracker under the primary category of - Attack not resulting in death. Within it, the sub-category selected is - Attacked for Hindu identity. In several cases, Hindus are attacked merely for their Hindu identity without any perceived provocation. A classic example of this category of religiously motivated hate crime is a murder in 2016. 7 ISIS terrorists were convicted for shooting a school principal in Kanpur because they got ‘triggered’ seeing the Kalava on his wrist and tilak that he had put. In this, the Hindu victim had offered no provocation except for his Hindu religious identity. The motivation for the murder was purely religious, driven by religious supremacy. Such cases where Hindus are targeted merely for their religious identity would be documented as a hate crime under this category. This case has been added to the tracker because minor Hindu students were deceptively made to drink urine by two of their Muslim classmates, on the instructions of Maulvi Ayan Babbar. This incident was not a harmless prank by the Muslim students; it was rooted in religious animosity as it was specifically targeted at Hindu students. The humiliation was deliberate, not accidental, and it reflected a clear attempt to denigrate their Hindu identity rather than to tease or bully them as individuals. Maulvi Ayan Babbar explicitly instructed the Muslim children to target Hindu students, directing them to execute an act that is humiliating and degrading to anyone's identity. The objective was not to target a particular child but to symbolically degrade the wider Hindu community. Such conduct reflects a communal intent, an effort to humiliate Hindus collectively by attacking the dignity of Hindu children. Maulvi Ayan Babbar channelised and weaponised his inner hatred toward the Hindu community through these minor Muslim students, using them as instruments to express his prejudices. It was a subtle assertion of Islamic identity and supremacy over the Hindu community by humiliating the Hindu community. The Maulvi targeted Hindu students not out of personal grievance, but because of what they represented: the Hindu identity he despised. Such actions reveal ideological hostility, where the Muslim children were influenced to enact symbolic violence against their Hindu classmates, normalising contempt and hostility against Hindus. Moreover, sustained, repeated acts over multiple days cannot be dismissed as childish mischief; they indicate consistent and intentional targeting. Hindu children were singled out, their water contaminated, and their dignity attacked. Similar patterns have been observed previously, where Muslim students have channelised their hatred for the Hindu community by victimising their Hindu classmates. For example, in Vadodara, a minor Hindu boy was stabbed to death by Muslim students after being targeted and humiliated for his religious identity, an assault also rooted in communal animosity rather than personal conflict. Furthermore, it was also reported that the Maulvi influenced children in the mosque to raise religious and communal slogans, thereby inculcating hatred toward Hindus and conditioning them to see Hindu identity as inferior or with contempt. This is how Muslim children are gradually influenced into a worldview where hostility toward the Hindu community is normalised. Over time, this manifests into extreme hatred and violence against the Hindu community when these Muslim children grow up. This establishes a clear religious motive: the cleric had been using influence over Muslim children to assert religious dominance and, when possible, to degrade Hindu children. This incident, therefore, cannot be viewed in isolation; it reflects an organised pattern of religiously motivated hostility directed at Hindu children. The involvement of a cleric and his actions to harm and humiliate their Hindu students makes the communal intent undeniable. Therefore, this case has been added to the tracker. Disclaimer: It is important to clarify that none of the media sources covering this case have specified the exact date when the victim's ordeal began, though it is mentioned that the Muslim students were urinating in bottles for the past four days. Thus, to document this case, we have used an indicative date— 9 November 2025—as a placeholder to represent the beginning of the student's suffering. While media coverage of the incident emerged on 14 November 2025, the Hinduphobia Tracker records the incident based on when the victim’s ordeal began, not when it was reported.
Victim Details
Total Victim
3
Deceased
0
Gender
- Male 1
- Female 2
- Third Gender 0
- Unknown 0
Caste
- SC/ST 0
- OBC 0
- General 0
- Unknown 3
Age Group
- Minor 3
- Adult 0
- Senior Citizen 0
- Unknown 0

Case Status
Complaint filed

Perpetrators Details
Perpetrators
Muslim Extremists
Perpetrators Range
From 2 To 5
Perpetrators Gender
male
