Attack on Hindu beliefs: Bhim Army supporter makes objectionable remarks against Hindu deities on social media

Case ID : 3234450 | Location : Hardoi, Uttar Pradesh, India | Date of Incident : Thu, 2 October, 2025
Case ID : 3234450
location Hardoi, Uttar Pradesh, India
date 2 October, 2025
Attack on Hindu beliefs: Bhim Army supporter makes objectionable remarks against Hindu deities on social media
Hate speech against Hindus
Anti-Hindu slurs, mocking faith

Case Summary

In Hardoi’s Sandi block, derogatory remarks against Hindu deities were posted on social media by a man named Pramod. According to media reports, the accused, a Bhim Army supporter, had a picture of Bhim Army chief Chandrashekhar Ravan on his Facebook account. Bhim Army is an anti-Hindu Ambedkarite group. The accused made several derogatory comments against Hindu deities. Upon receiving information about this, Bajrang Dal activists arrived at the Arwal police station on the afternoon of 3rd September 2025. Bajrang Dal activist Rahul Shukla filed a formal complaint against the accused. Following the complaint, police registered a case against Pramod and launched an investigation under various sections of the law. Station House Officer Amit Singh stated that the accused is being searched for and that action is being taken based on the complaint filed by the Bajrang Dal activists.

Why it is Hate Crime ?

This case has been added to the tracker under the primary category- Hate Speech against Hindus. The subcategory selected is- Anti-Hindu slurs, mocking faith. Anti-Hindu slurs and the deliberate mocking of the Hindu faith owing to religious animosity involve the usage of derogatory terms, stereotypes, or offensive references to religious practices, symbols, or figures. One of the common anti-Hindu slurs used against Hindus is “cow-worshipper” and “cow piss drinker”. The intention of using this term is to demean and mock Hindus as a group and their religious beliefs since Hindus consider the cow holy. Additionally, some symbols and the slurs attached to them have a historical context that exacerbates the insult, hate, stereotyping, dehumanisation and oppression against Hindus. Cow worship has been used for centuries to denigrate Hindus, insult their faith and oppress Hindus specifically as a religious group. There has been overwhelming documentation about how cow slaughter has been used to persecute Hindus with cow meat being thrown in temples and places of worship. There has also been overwhelming documentation where cow meat (beef) has been force-fed to Hindus to either forcefully convert them to Islam or denigrate their faith. Apart from cow worship, the Swastika – which holds deep religious significance for the Hindus – has also been misinterpreted and distorted to use as a slur against Hindus. Similarly, the worship of the Shivling has been used by supremacist ideologies and religions to denigrate Hindus owing to religious animosity. Such slurs and denigration stem out of inherent animosity and hate towards Hindus and their faith, therefore, it is categorised as hate speech targeted at Hindus specifically owing to their religious identity. This case has been added to the hate crime database as the accused, a supporter of the Bhim Army, deliberately posted derogatory remarks against Hindu deities to hurt the religious sentiments of the Hindu community. Hindu Deities are an integral part of the Hindu religion and are highly revered by Hindus. Any attempt to mock or abuse them is born out of animosity towards Hinduism. In this case, the objectionable remarks were a direct attack on the sanctity of the Hindu faith. It was, in fact, not a random or misguided act, but a calculated and premeditated effort to attack Hinduism and the larger Hindu society. In recent times, social media has increasingly become a platform for anti-Hindu hate, with derogatory memes, videos, and messages targeting Hindu religious symbols, practices, and deities. Such content is recognised as part of a broader pattern of Hinduphobia and religious hate crimes online. This deliberate targeting of revered deities firmly establishes this act as a religiously motivated hate crime; therefore, it is being categorised under the hate crime database of the Hinduphobia Tracker. It is important to mention here that the accused was a supporter of the Bhim Army, an Ambedkarite group. While the Bhim Army presents itself as a champion of Dalit rights, its actions and affiliations often contradict this claim. Dalits are very much Hindus, yet the Bhim Army frequently targets Hindu symbols, festivals, and practices, including those held sacred by Dalits themselves. This pattern suggests that the organisation’s agenda is less about genuine Dalit upliftment and more aligned with broader anti-Hindu narratives that seek to divide and weaken Hindu society from within. This becomes particularly apparent when the Bhim Army aligns with leftist and Islamist platforms, where identity politics is weaponised against Hindus. In such spaces, the micro identities of caste, region, and language are secondary; what matters most is religious identity. It is the Hindu identity, regardless of caste, that often becomes the target of animosity. As seen in cases where Dalit families were attacked for displaying Hindu symbols or worshipping deities, the hostility stems not from caste differences, but from a disdain for Hindu religiosity. For example, on May 19, 2020, reports emerged in which a Dalit family in Bihar’s Kishanganj district stated that the local Bhim Army unit attacked them for their Hindu beliefs, desecrating a temple as they objected to their reverence for Hindu deities and saffron flags. Similarly, on June 29, 2021, in Saharanpur, Uttar Pradesh, a Hindu named Saurabh Sharma was attacked by Bhim Army members over political differences. The assailants used swords and rods, causing severe injuries, and threatened to eliminate the Brahmin community from the area. Moreover, Bhim Army chief Chandrashekhar Azad has repeatedly made statements and taken positions that reflect his anti-Hindu stance. For instance, he has publicly endorsed conversion as a political weapon, invoking B.R. Ambedkar’s decision to leave Hinduism, and has actively supported movements that call for a rejection of Hindu festivals and practices. In fact, Chandrashekhar Azad's political trajectory has strongly focused on building a Dalit-Muslim alliance, a strategy that became particularly visible during his active participation in the anti-CAA (Citizenship Amendment Act) protests that culminated in the Delhi anti-Hindu Riots 2020. His brand of politics, under the banner of Dalit-Muslim unity, has contributed to narratives that vilify Hindu traditions and exacerbate targeted attacks against Hindus. Thus, by attacking Hindu symbols and aligning with forces hostile to Hinduism at large, the Bhim Army effectively turns against the cultural and spiritual traditions of the Dalit community itself. In doing so, it reinforces the very forces of division and religious antagonism that marginalise Dalits, not as a caste, but as Hindus. This contradiction reveals that, despite its stated mission, the Bhim Army’s trajectory increasingly serves an anti-Hindu, rather than a pro-Dalit agenda. Disclaimer: Hinduphobia Tracker generally records the date of an incident based on when the crime actually occurred, rather than the date it is reported in the media. However, in this case, media reports do not specify the exact date of the crime. The complaint was filed by Bajrang Dal activists on 3rd October 2025. Therefore, 3rd October 2025 is being used as the indicative date of the incident for documentation purposes.

Case Status Background
Gavel Icon

Case Status


Complaint registered

Case Status Background
Gavel Icon

Perpetrators Details

Perpetrators


Others

Perpetrators Range


One Person

Perpetrators Gender


male

Case Details SVG
The details of each case are updated till the day it has been added to the database. It is not practical for us to manually track the progress of every case listed in the Hinduphobia Tracker database. If you have additional information which you believe should reflect here, please provide additional details by clicking the button below. If you believe this case should not be considered a religiously motivated hate crime, you can proceed to raise a dispute using the same button.
Please note the case ID: 3234450 <click to copy case id>, you must enter the same in the form which will pop up after clicking the button.