Hinduism and Hindu deities denigrated; Sikh man urges Hindus to abandon their faith
Hansi, Haryana, India 
11 July, 2026
Case Summary
In the Chainat village of Hansi district, Haryana, Hindu religious sentiments were outraged after a Sikh man was seen making derogatory remarks about Hindu deities and Hindu religious traditions during a protest. According to reports, the comments were made during a protest in the Chainat village regarding electricity issues, which had been continuing for 56 days. During this time, the video went viral on social media, where the speaker addressed the Hindu women participating in the sit-in protest and mocked Hindu beliefs and practices, stating that people had "lost everything to the trap of worship." He sarcastically asked the gathering to "call Hanuman, Shiva, Gogamedi, or any of the millions of gods and goddesses" to solve their problems and ridiculed the worship of Hindu deities. He further questioned the existence of God and dismissed several revered Hindu religious observances and places of worship, including Chaudas, Purnima, Amavasya, Gogamedi, Khatu Shyam, Kali Mata, Navratri, and Hanuman, describing them as "hypocrisy." He urged those present to abandon these beliefs and instead join his organisation, identifying himself as the head of the "Turban Handle Jatta Organisation, Hansi Block." Following the circulation of the video, members of the Bajrang Dal objected to the remarks, stating that the comments had hurt Hindu religious sentiments. The organisation announced that it would submit a written complaint to the Superintendent of Police in Hansi seeking legal action against the speaker. At the time of reporting, the authenticity of the viral video and the date on which it was recorded had not been independently verified.
Why it is Hate Crime ?
This case has been added to the tracker under the primary category - Hate speech against Hindus. Within this, the subcategory selected for this case is - Anti-Hindu slurs/mocking faith. Anti-Hindu slurs and the deliberate mocking of the Hindu faith owing to religious animosity involve the usage of derogatory terms, stereotypes, or offensive references to religious practices, symbols, or figures. One of the common anti-Hindu slurs used against Hindus is “cow-worshipper” and “cow piss drinker”. The intention of using this term is to demean and mock Hindus as a group and their religious beliefs since Hindus consider the cow holy. Additionally, some symbols and the slurs attached to them have a historical context that exacerbates the insult, hate, stereotyping, dehumanisation and oppression against Hindus. Cow worship has been used for centuries to denigrate Hindus, insult their faith and oppress Hindus specifically as a religious group. There has been overwhelming documentation about how cow slaughter has been used to persecute Hindus with cow meat being thrown in temples and places of worship. There has also been overwhelming documentation where cow meat (beef) has been force-fed to Hindus to either forcefully convert them to Islam or denigrate their faith. Apart from cow worship, the Swastika – which holds deep religious significance for the Hindus – has also been misinterpreted and distorted to use as a slur against Hindus. Similarly, the worship of the Shivling has been used by supremacist ideologies and religions to denigrate Hindus owing to religious animosity. Such slurs and denigration stem out of inherent animosity and hate towards Hindus and their faith, therefore, it is categorised as hate speech targeted at Hindus specifically owing to their religious identity. This case has been added to the tracker because the accused made derogatory remarks about Hindu deities and religious traditions during an ongoing protest. The available facts deomnstrated that this incident constitutes a hate crime because the speech was not confined to expressing personal disbelief in God or engaging in a philosophical critique of religion. Instead, it involved the targeted and public denigration of Hinduism by ridiculing its deities, sacred traditions, religious observances, pilgrimage sites, and modes of worship before an assembled audience. The remarks were directed exclusively at Hindu beliefs and practices that are deeply revered by millions of devotees, thereby transforming what could otherwise have been a discussion on religion into an act of hostility directed at the Hindu religious community. The accused systematically mocked several central aspects of Hinduism. He questioned the existence of Hindu deities, sarcastically suggested that people should "call" various gods and goddesses to solve their problems, and dismissed prominent Hindu festivals, rituals, and places of worship as "hypocrisy." The references were not incidental; they encompassed multiple facets of Hindu religious life, including revered deities such as Hanuman, Shiva and Kali Mata, important observances such as Navratri, Purnima, Amavasya and Chaudas, and widely venerated pilgrimage traditions associated with Khatu Shyam and Gogamedi. Collectively ridiculing sacred beliefs and practices amounted todenigration of the Hindu faith rather than criticism of any particular custom or institution. The significance of these remarks must also be understood in light of the central role these beliefs and traditions occupy within Hinduism. Hindu deities are not symbolic figures but are worshipped as divine manifestations deserving of the highest reverence. Festivals such as Navratri, lunar observances like Purnima and Amavasya, and pilgrimage sites such as Khatu Shyam and Gogamedi hold profound religious and cultural importance for millions of Hindus. Publicly describing these beliefs and practices as fraudulent or worthy of ridicule strikes at the core of Hindu religious identity and has the effect of portraying the faith itself as irrational and contemptible. Such speech goes beyond disagreement with religious doctrine and instead demeans the community that adheres to those beliefs. The setting in which these remarks were delivered further aggravates the gravity of the incident. The comments were made from a public stage before a gathering of people participating in an ongoing protest. Delivering such statements in a public forum amplified their reach and increased their potential to influence the attitudes of those present. Hate speech does not require an explicit call for violence to cause harm; persistent public ridicule of a community's sacred beliefs can contribute to an environment in which prejudice, disrespect, and hostility towards that community become normalised. By presenting Hindu beliefs as objects of mockery before an audience, the speaker's remarks had the potential to reinforce negative stereotypes and foster contempt for Hindus and their faith. Furthermore, the speaker not only denigrated Hinduism and its deities but also urged those present to abandon their existing beliefs and join his own organisation. This went beyond mere religious debate or criticism and formed part of an attempt to persuade people to renounce their faith by first portraying it as irrational, fraudulent, and unworthy of belief. By ridiculing revered Hindu deities, festivals, rituals, and places of worship before encouraging the audience to align with his organisation, the speaker sought to undermine the legitimacy of Hinduism and weaken the religious convictions of its adherents. Such conduct is capable of creating an inferiority complex among believers regarding their own faith while fostering hostility and disrespect towards Hinduism and its sacred symbols. The systematic denigration of a community's religion as a precursor to encouraging people to abandon it underscores the religiously motivated nature of the incident and reinforces why it qualifies as a hate incident targeting the Hindu community. The public ridicule of Hinduism was not an isolated expression of personal disbelief but formed part of a broader attempt to erode the religious convictions of Hindus by portraying their faith as irrational and worthless. Such conduct targeted the religious identity of the Hindu community and sought to facilitate religious conversion through the denigration of Hindu beliefs, making the religiously motivated nature of the incident evident. Disclaimer: The Hinduphobia Tracker records incidents based on when an event occurred or when the victim's ordeal began. It is important to clarify that none of the media sources covering this case has specified the exact date when the accused made those comments. Therefore, for documentation purposes, we have recorded the date based on when the incident was reported in the media, 11 July 2026.
Case Status
Unknown
Perpetrators Details
Perpetrators
Sikh Extremists
Perpetrators Range
One Person
Perpetrators Gender
male
Sources 
