Hindu woman lured, sexually assaulted and pressured for religious conversion by Muslim men in Hyderabad; accused similarly targeted multiple Hindu women
Hyderabad, Telangana, India 
9 April, 2026
Case Summary
In the Panjagutta area of Hyderabad, Telangana, a Hindu woman was deceived into a relationship, sexually assaulted, threatened, and pressured to convert to Islam by two Muslim brothers. One of the perpetrators, identified as Jameer, targeted the victim under the pretext of love and later subjected her to abuse and coercion for religious conversion. Police investigations also revealed that multiple other Hindu victims were targeted in the same manner by the Muslim perpetrators. According to media reports, Jameer, along with his younger brother Miraj, operated in the Panjagutta area and targeted Hindu women through planned interactions. They approached Hindu girls and initiated relationships by presenting romantic interest. Through these interactions, they gained the trust of multiple Hindu women over time. The Hindu victim came into contact with Jameer, who developed a relationship with her under the guise of love. Over time, he gained her confidence and established control over the relationship. After securing her trust, he began exerting pressure on her. During the course of the relationship, Jameer sexually assaulted the Hindu woman. He used intimidation and threats to silence her. He warned her of serious consequences if she disclosed the abuse to anyone. Following the assault, Jameer pressured the Hindu woman to convert to Islam. He harassed her repeatedly and attempted to force her to abandon her faith. The pressure to convert was accompanied by threats and continued intimidation. Investigations revealed that Jameer and Miraj had targeted multiple Hindu women in a similar manner. Around five Hindu women were identified as having been approached and deceived through similar methods. Both brothers used a pattern of initiating romantic contact, gaining trust, and then exerting pressure on the victims. Reports also revealed that Jameer had prior criminal involvement in the same jurisdiction. A case had previously been registered against him under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act in connection with the molestation of a minor girl. Despite this, he continued to target Hindu women using similar methods. Miraj was also involved in assisting in identifying and approaching potential victims. In the recent incident, after being subjected to sexual assault, threats, and pressure to convert, the Hindu woman approached the police and filed a complaint. The complaint detailed the sequence of deception, abuse, and coercion she experienced at the hands of Jameer. Following the complaint, the Panjagutta police registered a case and initiated an investigation into the activities of Jameer and Miraj. Both perpetrators were taken into custody, and further inquiry was conducted to identify additional victims and determine the extent of their actions. The police examined whether other individuals were involved and continued to investigate the pattern of targeting Hindu women. The police stated that protection measures would be provided to the Hindu women who reported threats to their safety. The investigation remained ongoing, and further legal action was to be taken based on the findings.
Why it is Hate Crime ?
This case has been added to the tracker under the primary category - Crimes against women in relationships and other sexual crimes. Within this, the subcategory selected is - Brainwashed and/or groomed. Under this, the tertiary category selected is - Rape and sexual assault/harassment. In our database, we have not added incidents where women have converted to another religion of their free will and no allegations of forced/involuntary conversion have been made. However, there are certain cases of conversion where the consent itself is a result of the brainwashing or grooming of a minor by the non-Hindu perpetrator trying to victimise a woman for her Hindu religious identity. The phenomenon of grooming points to non-Hindu perpetrators identifying their Hindu victims’ vulnerabilities and exploiting them over months and sometimes years, to extract the supposed ‘consent’ in order to convert their religion. In most cases of grooming, the victims are minors or the grooming started when the victim was a minor. In other cases of grooming, the non-Hindu perpetrator brainwashes and grooms a minor victim to extract their trust and then proceeds to rape them repeatedly with the intent of converting them to their faith. It is pertinent to understand here that when the victim is a minor, the ‘consent’ to convert or enter into a romantic relationship with an adult itself is redundant – addressed by POCSO. While every case of conversion of a minor and incidents of establishing a physical relationship with a minor by an adult is a crime, for the purpose of this database, a case would be considered a hate crime only if there is a distinct religious angle to the grooming. For example, in the UK, if a Hindu minor is targeted by Pakistani grooming gangs, it would be considered a hate crime because the victims are specifically targeted owing to their non-Muslim religious identity with the perpetrators being Muslim. In other cases, if a Hindu minor is brainwashed into entering a physical relationship with the non-Hindu adult perpetrator and the family alleges grooming/brainwashing of the minor to convert her religion, it would form a part of this database. If the victim is a Hindu adult, the case would form a part of this database only if the victim herself says that she was brainwashed/groomed to convert her religion. However, if the victim is deceased (murdered or otherwise), the case would form a part of this database if her family/friends provided testimony that the victim was brainwashed/groomed to convert her religion. Since these crimes have a distinct religious angle where the victim is being targeted owing to her Hindu religious identity, these cases are considered a hate crime. Another subcategory selected is - Assault or threat upon refusal to convert. When Hindu women are in a relationship with non-Hindu men, there are cases where the woman faces threats or assault after she refuses to convert and change her religious identity owing to pressure/force by the non-Hindu man. Such relationships may be consensual with the religious identity of the non-Hindu man known to the victim. Somewhere along the relationship, the non-Hindu man starts pressurizing the Hindu woman to convert to Islam and upon her refusal, assaults or threatens the victim. Such cases are driven by specific religious motivations and against the religious identity of the victim and are therefore qualified as hate crimes. Cases where the Hindu woman converts to Islam and does not file a complaint about the force or threat, are not considered a part of the hate tracker, even though, it may be argued that the woman was brainwashed or threatened to convert to Islam. Another primary category selected is- Predatory Proselytisation. The subcategory selected is- Harassment, threats, coercion for conversion. Harassment covers a wide range of behaviours of an offensive nature. It is commonly understood as behaviour that demeans, humiliates, and intimidates a person, including threats and coercion. Harassment and threats, in this case, find their root on discriminatory grounds which has the effect of nullifying a person’s rights or infringing upon his freedom to exercise his right specifically owing to the victim’s religious identity. Verbal and physical threats and psychological or physical harassment are often used against Hindu victims because they choose to practice their professed religion. Religious harassment also includes forced and involuntary conversions by harassment, threats or coercion. Coercion includes intimidatory tactics like force-feeding a Hindu victim beef to convert to another religion, forceful circumcision etc. In several cases documented, non-Hindu perpetrators or those who harbour specific animosity towards Hinduism, harass victims simply based on their religious identity. Such cases often also include harassment to ensure the Hindu victim abandons his/her professed religion and adopts the religion of the perpetrator. Such cases where Hindu victims are harassed to convert to the perpetrator’s religion are rooted in animosity towards the victim’s religious identity and are therefore documented as religiously motivated hate crimes. In this case, a Hindu woman was lured into a relationship, sexually exploited, and pressured to convert to Islam by the Muslim perpetrator Jameer and his brother Miraj. They deceived her with promises of genuine love, only to unleash a calculated campaign of religious coercion that shattered her trust and autonomy. This pattern of targeting her faith made it a clear instance of a religiously motivated hate crime from the very beginning. Even though Jameer did not conceal his Muslim identity, the nature of their relationship showcases that the Hindu victim was made to believe that their religious differences would pose no barrier to their romance, leading her to lower her guard and enter the relationship. Yet, once her vulnerability was exposed, he coerced her to abandon Hinduism for Islam, revealing the deception as a deliberate trap rooted in religious animosity. This betrayal from the outset underscored that the targeting of this Hindu woman stemmed directly from her faith, marking it as a religiously motivated hate crime designed to erode her Hindu identity. The victim was also subjected to sexual exploitation by the Muslim accused. This act went far beyond mere gratification; it served as a tool to physically and religiously dominate her due to her Hindu identity, with the explicit intent to humiliate her and, by extension, her community. By violating her body in this context, Jameer asserted supremacy over a member of the Hindu faith, breaking her spirit to render her more susceptible to conversion. For a woman who trusted him intimately, this assault carried profound trauma, amplifying the religious hatred that drove the perpetrators to such degrading lengths, and cementing the case as a religiously motivated hate crime. The act of forcing the Hindu woman to convert to Islam constituted a direct assault on her religious autonomy, stripping her of the fundamental right to practise and preserve her faith without interference. It treated her Hinduism as something discardable and inherently inferior, unworthy of respect alongside the perpetrator's beliefs, which inflicted deep emotional wounds as she watched her spiritual core being dismissed and devalued. This violation of her religious autonomy extended to her community, signalling that Hindu women could be easily preyed upon and forcibly converted, making it a stark, religiously motivated hate crime born of supremacist contempt. When the victim refused to convert to Islam, Jameer responded with further assaults and threats, demonstrating that the perpetrators were prepared to breach every boundary to strip her of her Hindu faith and identity. These violent tactics coerced submission, exposing the depths of their hostility towards her as a Hindu woman, where physical harm and intimidation became weapons to enforce religious conversion. For her, enduring this escalation meant living in constant fear, her resilience tested against an unyielding campaign of terror, which unequivocally defined the acts as a religiously motivated hate crime. The fact that Jameer and Miraj targeted nearly five other Hindu women through identical tactics, luring them into relationships before exploiting and pressuring them for conversion, revealed a systematic pattern of preying on Hindus specifically for their religious identity. This was no coincidence but a nefarious strategy to sexually dominate and forcibly convert members of the Hindu community, undermining their faith on a broader scale. The repeated focus on Hindu victims highlighted the perpetrators' animus towards Hinduism itself, turning individual betrayals into a collective assault that qualified as a religiously motivated hate crime. Given that this case met several parameters of a religiously motivated hate crime, it was added to the Hate Crime Database of the Hinduphobia Tracker. Disclaimer: The exact date of the incident is not specified in the available information. The tracker records incident dates based on when the crime occurred rather than when it was reported by the media. In this case, 10 April 2026 has been used as the indicative incident date, based on the article publication date. This has been recorded for documentation purposes only. In this case, along with the primary Hindu victim, five other Hindu women were targeted in a similar manner by the perpetrators. Henceforth, the victim count has been recorded as six. This is noted for documentation purposes only in the Hinduphobia Tracker's Hate Crime Database.
Victim Details
Total Victim
6
Deceased
0
Gender
- Male 0
- Female 6
- Third Gender 0
- Unknown 0
Caste
- SC/ST 0
- OBC 0
- General 0
- Unknown 6
Age Group
- Minor 0
- Adult 1
- Senior Citizen 0
- Unknown 5
Case Status
Arrested
Perpetrators Details
Perpetrators
Muslim Extremists
Perpetrators Range
From 2 To 5
Perpetrators Gender
male
Sources 
