Ahead of Ganeshotsav and Krishna Janmashtami, Karnataka education dept bans use of school grounds for non-academic use in Mangalore
Mangalore, Karnataka, India 
15 July, 2024
Case Summary
In Karnataka, a controversy arose after the Congress government issued a circular on 16th July prohibiting the use of school playgrounds for non-academic purposes in Mangalore. The directive, issued by the Dakshina Kannada District Director of School Education, barred government, aided, and unaided schools from using school grounds and buildings for non-academic events, affecting upcoming Krishna Janmashtami and Ganeshotsav festivals. Hindu organizations expressed outrage, viewing the timing of the order as an attack on Hindu festivals. The circular warned that school principals would be held accountable for violations. The directive prompted widespread objections from several Hindu rights organizations.
Why it is Hate Crime ?
In several cases, it is seen that the administration/state disallows a religious practice owing to prejudicial orders and concerns, targeted specifically against the Hindu community. Such restriction/prohibition would be considered documented as a hate crime because the orders are often a result of pressure by groups that harbour animosity towards Hinduism and Hindus. Often, the restriction by the authorities is driven by bias, hostility, or prejudice against the specific community being stopped from holding a religious practice, by pressure groups that harbour animosity towards Hindus, intrinsic to their faith. Since practices are intrinsic to the faith of the Hindus, such prejudicial restriction is considered a curtailing of the fundamental rights of the Hindu community. In several cases, for example, the authorities ban a Hindu religious practice due to pressure from groups opposed to the religion. In other instances the prohibition is selectively enforced against one religious group (Hindus) while others are allowed to proceed. There are still other cases where the authorities preemptively restrict a religious practice by Hindus because those who hold animosity towards Hindus may get “provoked” leading to them being violent, thereby assuaging the sentiments of those who hold animosity towards Hindus by curtailing the religious rights of Hindus. Such acts and orders are prejudiced, indicating discriminatory motives owing to the capitulation to groups that harbour animosity towards Hindus and therefore, would be categorized as a religiously motivated hate crime since the original pressure leading to the order itself is a result of hatred/bias/prejudice/religious hate against Hindus. In this case, the Congress government in Karnataka decided to prohibit schools from using their grounds and buildings for non-academic events specifically ahead of the upcoming Hindu festivals like Krishna Janmashtami and Ganeshotsav. Krishna Janmashtami and Ganeshotsav are significant festivals in Hindu culture. The prohibition of using school facilities exclusively for Hindu festivals while potentially allowing non-academic events for other communities can create a perception of bias. This action may lead to feelings of marginalization among Hindu communities, who may view it as an unfair targeting of their cultural practices. Further, every individual has the right to practice their religious faith and restricting someone from doing that can also be considered a prejudicial order denying the Hindu community its fundamental rights. Such arbitrary actions taken against Hindus are prejudicial to the rights of Hindus and stem from animosity and prejudice against Hindu beliefs, which is why this case is being categorised as a religiously motivated hate crime.
Case Status
Unknown
Perpetrators Details
Perpetrators
State and Establishment
Perpetrators Range
N/A
Perpetrators Gender
unknown
Sources 
